Explain share losses before the QBR
Decompose them into distribution, velocity, price/mix, and promo — then name the why, cited to source.
Read your trade spend, shipment records, and past category reviews against syndicated measurement, retailer POS, and live consumer signal — for a complete view of your brand in one place.
When sell-through dips, Merciv connects the panel and the conversation to say why, cited, before anyone asks you to defend it.
Merciv pools reviews across every storefront into one portfolio view — so the complaint no single site surfaces alone shows up as a theme.
Concepts read against segment models grounded in licensed data — synthetic personas included, always tied to real evidence.
The shopper and category story behind your JBP ask, every claim clickable back to its source.
Decompose them into distribution, velocity, price/mix, and promo — then name the why, cited to source.
Read both sources in one answer, with differences in coverage, definitions, and timing shown rather than silently resolved.
Three to four months of prep in one place — velocity, ACV, competitive mapping, and the shopper story.
Net category lift, cannibalization by SKU, and sustain-lift ratio — the numbers buyers now ask for.
Where trade-down is happening, why, and the differentiation story that holds your facings.
Put it against live category signal and your own concept-test archive, before development money commits.
Watch the category conversation move in the weeks before it clears syndicated — then confirm it there.
Ask a decade of U&A, segmentation, and concept tests instead of re-fielding what’s already in the archive.
Panels, retailer POS, and shipment records can tell different stories. Reconciling them by hand starts over each cycle, while line reviews and category reviews run on fixed dates.
Does this replace NielsenIQ? That renewal is under scrutiny.
No — it makes that line item easier to defend. Merciv connects the NIQ, Circana, and panel read you already license to social, reviews, and your own archive, so the subscription explains sell-through instead of only reporting it.
Isn’t this just social listening with a different name?
Listening shows the conversation alone. Merciv joins it to licensed category data and your archive, with every claim cited back to source.
We already have an internal GPT on our research archive
Merciv adds the licensed external and live-category layer that archive doesn’t contain — cited to file and page, and honest when the evidence is thin rather than filling the gap.
A top 10 U.S. beverage company cut research cycles from 18 months to 3 and reduced costs by ~87% with Merciv. 3 major studies completed in one quarter.
A Fortune 50 retailer prevented ~$12M in potential overstock after Merciv detected a 43% increase in AC breakdown mentions and identified demand for fans.
Built on licensed sources with retailer data terms honored, not scraped or resold
Category and segment intelligence, never person-level targeting
How every answer is sourced is documented and reviewable
Each answer links back to source material the reader is authorized to open
Your data is never used to train models, yours or anyone’s
Independently audited controls, cleared for procurement
Bring a subcategory and the number you have to explain. We’ll show Merciv reading it, cited.
Read case studies