Explain velocity dips
Connect the Circana number to the occasion, format, or claim that moved it — every line clickable to source.
Read your trade spend, shipment records, and past concept tests against syndicated measurement, menu and foodservice signal, and live consumer conversation — for a complete view of your brand in one place.
How usage moments are shifting under health, economic, and cultural pressure — and where your category shows up now that it didn’t before.
What’s moving from foodservice and conversation toward retail shelves, tracked continuously, so the line review starts from where the cycle is heading.
Health intent from surveys next to actual category behavior, so the read reflects what eaters actually buy, not just what they claim to want.
Where your price and value perception actually stands, cited, and the category story that holds the facing at the next reset.
Connect the Circana number to the occasion, format, or claim that moved it — every line clickable to source.
Which of your packs are losing units to smaller portions, and which protein and satiety plays are absorbing them.
Buyers pull their own numbers now. Arrive with the shopper reason behind them, ending in three prioritized actions.
Where your SKUs are gaining and losing — mini meals, purposeful snacking, late-night, alcohol substitution.
Which protein, gut-health, and clean-label claims consumers actually believe — in their words, with sources attached.
Put a pipeline concept against live category conversation and a decade of your own concept tests.
Repeat behavior and consumer verbatims on competitor SKUs — not just their distribution gains.
Where shoppers are trading down, why, and the cited case that holds your facing.
A flavor can appear on menus, in recipe search, and in creator content before it moves a scan number. Category reviews and innovation gates leave little time to reconcile those signals with panel, POS, and shipment data.
Does this replace our Circana subscription?
No, and you would not propose that internally. Merciv connects what happened to why — the panel and syndicated read you already license, joined to menu, reviews, and category conversation, every line cited to source.
We built an insights GPT on our own archive. Why add this?
Your archive is the half Merciv doesn’t have to rebuild. What it adds is the licensed external and live-category layer around it, cited to source, and honest when the evidence is thin instead of inventing a plausible answer.
How do you handle the say/do gap?
Stated intent from surveys next to observed behavior in the category, quantified and cited — so the read reflects what eaters actually buy, not just what they claim to want.
A top 10 U.S. beverage company cut research cycles from 18 months to 3 and reduced costs by ~87% with Merciv. 3 major studies completed in one quarter.
A Fortune 50 retailer prevented ~$12M in potential overstock after Merciv detected a 43% increase in AC breakdown mentions and identified demand for fans.
Built on licensed sources with retailer data terms honored, not scraped or resold
Category and segment intelligence, never person-level targeting
How every answer is sourced is documented and reviewable
Each answer links back to source material the reader is authorized to open
Your data is never used to train models, yours or anyone’s
Independently audited controls, cleared for procurement
Bring a subcategory and the shift you have to explain. We’ll show Merciv reading the occasion behind it, cited.