Give the business answers without losing control of the data
Permission-aware retrieval, so each person sees only what they’re already cleared to see.
Access expires automatically, stale research gets flagged before anyone cites it, and every claim traces to source — so your company’s memory scales safely as you grow.
Permission-aware retrieval, so each person sees only what they’re already cleared to see.
A sanctioned place to ask, with an audit trail — instead of verbatims pasted into a public chatbot.
Which source, which document, which retrieval path — exportable when security asks.
Model provenance, retention policy, tenant isolation, and subprocessors, documented before procurement asks for them.
Classify it and log it, against the EU AI Act’s high-risk obligations.
Governed self-serve for recurring asks, so modeling stops sitting behind ad-hoc requests.
Structured, sourced consumer evidence your segmentation, forecasting, and MMM can actually consume.
Your assistant keeps the archive. This adds the licensed external signal and the citation contract.
We’ve built an internal RAG assistant. What does yours add?
Keep it. What an internal build can’t hold is the licensed external and live-category layer, permission-aware across every source at query time. Merciv adds that layer and coexists with what your team already runs.
Is there any data migration? I’m not moving anything out of the warehouse.
None. Snowflake, Databricks, Looker, and SAP are read in place, and Merciv inherits your access model rather than standing up a second one. Nothing has to move somewhere new to be queried.
Legal found teams pasting verbatims into ChatGPT. How does this stop that?
By making the governed path the faster one. Shadow AI shows up when the sanctioned route is slower than the unsanctioned one, so the fix is a tool people prefer: permission-aware, cited, and zero training on your data.
Research files, syndicated feeds, and warehouse tables live in one structured corpus with a single set of rules. You can see what’s in it, what’s current, and where two sources hold conflicting answers on the same question.
Scope access by team, category, or project, and Merciv holds the boundary every time someone asks a question. Two users asking the same thing get two different answer sets — enforced server-side, not by convention.


Every claim traces to its file, page, and version by default. When someone asks how a finding got in front of leadership, it takes a click, not an entire project, to produce the full audit trail.


Snowflake, Databricks, Looker, and SAP connect directly, so analysis runs against live data instead of a manual export. Nothing has to move somewhere new to be queried.
Hybrid retrieval paths keep answers precise at corpus sizes where standard RAG degrades. Quantitative questions are computed in code and shown with their lineage — not estimated by the model.


Merciv reads from the warehouse, BI, and research tools you already govern — in place, without copying your data somewhere new. It inherits the access controls you’ve already defined, so adopting it doesn’t mean standing up a parallel system to administer.
Connects to Snowflake, Databricks, Looker, and SAP directly. No new pipeline, no duplicate copy to keep in sync
Permissions follow your existing identity provider and team structure — not a second set of rules to maintain by hand
No infrastructure to provision, no migration project, no ongoing admin burden landing on your team
Each answer links back to source material anyone can open
Open the score — agreement, recency, coverage — and see where sources disagreed
Thin evidence is flagged, not filled in with something plausible
Your data is never used to train models, yours or anyone’s
Synthetic personas are evidence-grounded segments from your licensed data — not invented consumers
Independently audited controls, cleared for procurement
Bring a question your analysts already field. We’ll run a working session on your own sources and show the provenance behind every claim.
Read case studiesThree pieces on provenance, governance, and holding AI answers to an evaluation bar.
How to produce cited consumer intelligence that holds up under audit — sourcing, confidence, and caveats.
Source attribution, confidence tiers, and governance built to hold up under CFO scrutiny.
What general-purpose AI can’t give a data team: persistent corpus, page-level citations, and permissioned retrieval.